From "Radical Extremism" to "Balanced Copyright" : Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda

Chapter Eleven

How Virtue Ethics Might Help Erase C-32’s Conceptual Incoherence
David Lametti

The proposed changes to the Canadian Copyright Act set out in Bill C-32 illuminate the conceptual incoherence of what has come to be commonly known as “copyright plus” or “paracopyright.” In terms of copyright re- form, the new provisions in C-32 seek to strike a balance between the interests of right-holders and the interests of users. A number of the pro- posed changes are welcome, and reflect the legitimate—or at least what ought to be the legitimate — expectations of copyright-holders and users. The non-copyright aspects of the Bill—the protection of digital locks, for example—have their grounding in other normative paradigms and are more problematic when juxtaposed against the traditional copyright provisions contained in the Bill and in the rest of the Copyright Act. They represent a serious conceptual flaw or incoherence in the Bill. This cen- tral conceptual flaw could overwhelm the copyright balances struck in the other parts of C-32, in Canadian jurisprudence, and in copyright theory and history generally.

Creative Commons Legal Code
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Canada
Items in Your Cart
Your shopping cart is empty.

Attention Authors

Irwin Law is accepting manuscript submissions. Please contact the editor for more information.

Price List

Download Price List
(PDF, 185KB)

Customer Service

Instructors
Obtaining Examination Copies

Contact Irwin Law:
Irwin Law
Suite 206
14 Duncan Street
Toronto, ON
M5H 3G8

TOLL FREE:
1.888.314.9014

Facebook Find us on Facebook

Irwin Law RSS Feed
Irwin Law RSS FAQ